AESOP YA Blog statement – Summer 2022

There is a change that is happening within the planning discipline. Issues of public and private health, natural disasters, international conflicts, the rise of populism and illiberalism but also personal well-being, autonomy, and critique towards positions of power are evolving around the built environment. The fundamentally social and environmental nature of the planning discipline is challenged every day, and planning pedagogy and education are, we argue, still struggling to adapt.

In 2019, no one had thought that planning as a discipline could be taught online, yet our education processes have been tackled to do just that. Now that the world is returning to a very fragile ‘normality’ and many of the challenges of 2020 and before are still present, planning education is at a turning point, and many questions are unanswered:

+ What is going to happen to planning and urban studies pedagogy?

+ Are we returning to ‘normal’  and the much-needed in-person interaction to study and engage with the built environment? 

+ Are we going to a hybrid model in which students select what type of education they prefer?

+ Are we -as planners- becoming more forward-thinking?

The emerging changes are significant, not only in methodologies, tools, teaching styles, etc. Those necessary adjustments are the first stage of the transition to virtuality or a hybrid model. There is a second obvious problem concerning the correction of geographical inequities that AESOP has tried to bring to the discussion. Virtuality can open the doors for an analogous phenomenon, a very high market concentration, to reorganise the world of higher education in planning and generate more inequalities in the periphery.

Imagine a young woman from a small town or neighbourhood who wants to study planning or one of its associated professions. Why would you prefer a local university in your own context if, through virtual classes, you can take all or part of your degree at a university in the global north, where, in theory, the most ‘renowned’ institutions are? At half or maybe a subsidised cost?

What will happen with locality, context, and awareness of the local needs of the built environment if this is an evolving trend in planning education?

Considering all these issues, we also want to remember that the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP) is a network of European and international universities, their departments, and affiliated schools engaged in teaching and research in urban and regional planning. This is our niche and the focus we want to redirect our efforts to what we believe is the central role that AESOP, and mainly AESOP Young Academics, must tackle. 

In a ‘reset’ for our blog and in collaboration with the YA Coordination Team, we are aiming at bringing exclusively two types of discussions forward:

 (1) Pedagogical topics about planning, particularly considering planning education post-2020

Continue our conversation, albeit more spread in time, with (2) topical commentary on planning issues, reflections on previous work, viewpoints, stories, and case studies. 

Therefore, we want to issue a call for contributions on the first theme of planning pedagogy, focusing our efforts on that while simultaneously accepting more general and sporadic submissions for related topics.

If you are interested in participating in the discussion with an entry article, kindly submit your proposal to blog@aesop-youngacademics.net.

We are looking forward to seeing your contributions!

YA Coordination Team + AESOP YA Blog

Mennatullah Hendawy and Luis Hernando Lozano-Paredes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.